Re: list function from FTPAPI_H

[Scott Klement <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

> How much store do you put in the format of comments in FTPAPI_H?  In particular, 
> (*) The plus-sign boxing comments end at column 70, although other comments
>     extend further.  Going further to the right would leave a few fewer line
>     in FTPAPI_H and the listing.

It doesn't make much difference to me whether I save a handful of 
records in a source member.


> (*) APIs FTP_url_get_raw, FTP_url_get, and FTP_Login have parentheses suffixed
>     in the short summaries.  Is this significant?

No.  It just helps identify a word like FTP_url_get as a procedure.  I 
find it to be a nice visual cue.


> (*) Do you value source colourization?  It adds a couple of lines to the work
>     of listing the short summaries.

I don't follow this question.  What are you asking me?  Whether you 
should colorize the summaries?  Whether I want my copy book to be 
colorized?  Whether I like WDSC's colorization features?

If you're talking about inserting hex codes into the member to make it 
show up with colors in SEU, then my answer is "I hate it when people do 
that!"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the FTPAPI mailing list.  To unsubscribe, please go to:
http://www.scottklement.com/mailman/listinfo/ftpapi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------